Connect with us

TWITTER

Millennials like me are abandoning Twitter – I feel less lazy and am thinking better already

Published

on

Once upon a time, whenever I used to bemoan the toxicity of Twitter to bored and baffled friends, they’d ask why I didn’t simply log out once and for all. I’d shoot them an incredulous look, followed by a huff that suggested the answer was entirely obvious: as a journalist, a Twitter account was as crucial as a laptop or Wi-Fi (both of which are necessary primarily to check Twitter, of course).

Without Twitter, I’d be entirely out of the loop, trailing behind in terms of pop cultural titbits, foreign affairs, political discourse and celebrity gossip. Industry peers have always considered the platform a necessary evil of the job – if you don’t tweet the link to an article you’ve shared, did you even write it? A commonly shared dream amongst writers is to reach a point in their career where they don’t need it – where they’re confident enough in the reach of their work that their Twitter is rendered redundant, and they can bask in a world wide web without bad takes and bad faith quote tweets.

It’s unsurprising so many of us deem it integral to our work, since many of us have in many ways had our careers made by the platform, crossing paths with our future editors on it or commissioned off the back of threads.

A guide to today’s talking points, straight to your inbox

Yet, despite the professional benefits, some of us have simply decided that being Extremely Online™ isn’t worth it. Over the past few years, I’ve anecdotally noted a Great Millennial Media flight from Twitter. And it’s not just journalists – celebrities such as Hayley Bieber, Lizzo, and Millie Bobby Brown are just a few who have called it quits for one reason or another.

Advertisement

A number of friends of mine (mostly black and female – which is unsurprising, given the amount of abuse black women online can face) have elected to either use it as a bulletin board where they only post work-related tweets or none at all. It’s something I’ve been doing increasingly for some time (apart from dipping in for Love Island discourse), and am happy to report I’m still employed.

See also  Twitter reacts to the alternative Wisconsin football uniforms for the Notre Dame game

It’s made me realise how much FOMO dictates our online experiences, and that I am ultimately fine not being across every single viral moment or trending topic. And aside from no longer having anxiety over potential pile-ons and freedom from the endless doom scroll, there has been another unexpected by-product: I think I’m thinking better.

When I first started using Twitter, it made me somewhat smarter. Or at least feel smarter. I was exposed to opposing views which both challenged and reinforced my own beliefs. I was forced to think and rethink and was bowled over by the accessibility of so much information.

Simultaneously, it made me lazy. The willingness with which we retweet information without fact checking, and too often we use the credibility of who tweeted it, rather than the source. It’s crucial to have viewpoints challenged, but often it feels like the opposite, as though groupthink is being actively encouraged on the site.

Since I’ve scaled back, it’s been refreshing to discuss issues offline, with people that dedicate more than 280 characters to the debate.

Read More

Advertisement

TWITTER

Twitter Admits Policy ‘Errors’ After Far-Right Abuse Its New Rules of Posting Pictures

Published

on

By

twitter-admits-policy-‘errors’-after-far-right-abuse-its-new-rules-of-posting-pictures

Twitter’s new picture permission policy was aimed at combating online abuse, but US activists and researchers said Friday that far-right backers have employed it to protect themselves from scrutiny and to harass opponents.

Even the social network admitted the rollout of the rules, which say anyone can ask Twitter to take down images of themselves posted without their consent, was marred by malicious reports and its teams’ own errors.

It was just the kind of trouble anti-racism advocates worried was coming after the policy was announced this week.

Their concerns were quickly validated, with anti-extremism researcher Kristofer Goldsmith tweeting a screenshot of a far-right call-to-action circulating on Telegram: “Due to the new privacy policy at Twitter, things now unexpectedly work more in our favor.”

“Anyone with a Twitter account should be reporting doxxing posts from the following accounts,” the message said, with a list of dozens of Twitter handles.

Advertisement

Gwen Snyder, an organizer and researcher in Philadelphia, said her account was blocked this week after a report to Twitter about a series of 2019 photos she said showed a local political candidate at a march organized by extreme-right group Proud Boys.

Rather than go through an appeal with Twitter she opted to delete the images and alert others to what was happening.

“Twitter moving to eliminate (my) work from their platform is incredibly dangerous and is going to enable and embolden fascists,” she told AFP.

In announcing the privacy policy on Tuesday, Twitter noted that “sharing personal media, such as images or videos, can potentially violate a person’s privacy, and may lead to emotional or physical harm.”

See also  Twitter User Asks if Elon Musk Is an Alien: See His Hilarious Reply | Technology News - Gadgets 360

But the rules don’t apply to “public figures or individuals when media and accompanying Tweets are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse.”

Advertisement

By Friday, Twitter noted the roll out had been rough: “We became aware of a significant amount of coordinated and malicious reports, and unfortunately, our enforcement teams made several errors.”

“We’ve corrected those errors and are undergoing an internal review to make certain that this policy is used as intended,” the firm added.

Continue Reading

TWITTER

Jack Dorsey Post Twitter Is Chasing His Crypto, Fintech Dream

Published

on

By

jack-dorsey-post-twitter-is-chasing-his-crypto,-fintech-dream
en flag
sv flag

At a packed Miami conference in June, Jack Dorsey, mused in front of thousands of attendees about where his real passion lay: “If I weren’t at Square or Twitter, I’d be working on Bitcoin.”

On Monday, Dorsey made good on one part of that, announcing he would leave Twitter for the second time, handing the CEO position to a 10-year veteran at the firm. The 45-year-old entrepreneur, who is often described as an enigma with varied interests from meditation to yoga to fashion design, plans to pursue his passion which include focusing on running Square and doing more philanthropic work, according to a source familiar with his plan.

Well before the surprise news, Dorsey had laid the groundwork for his next chapter, seeding both companies with cryptocurrency-related projects.

Underlying Dorsey’s broader vision is the principle of “decentralisation,” or the idea that technology and finance should not be concentrated among a handful of gatekeepers, as it is now, but should, instead, be steered by the hands of the many, either people or entities.

The concept has played out at Square, which has built a division devoted to working on projects and awarding grants with the aim of growing Bitcoin’s popularity globally. Bitcoin price in India stood at Rs. 44.52 lakh as of 12:50pm IST on December 1.

Advertisement

Dorsey has been a longtime proponent of Bitcoin, and the appeal is that the cryptocurrency will allow for private and secure transactions with the value of Bitcoin unrelated to any government.

The idea has also underpinned new projects at Twitter, where Dorsey tapped a top lieutenant – and now the company’s new CEO Parag Agrawal – to oversee a team that is attempting to construct a decentralised social media protocol, which will allow different social platforms to connect with one another, similar to the way email providers operate.

See also  7 cool tools for Twitter

The project called Bluesky will aim to allow users control over the types of content they see online, removing the “burden” on companies like Twitter to enforce a global policy to fight abuse or misleading information, Dorsey said in 2019 when he announced Bluesky.

Bitcoin has also figured prominently at both of his companies. Square became one of the first public companies to own Bitcoin assets on its balance sheet, having invested $220 million (roughly Rs. 1,650 crore) in the cryptocurrency.

In August, Square created a new business unit called TBD to focus on Bitcoin. The company is also planning to build a hardware wallet for Bitcoin, a Bitcoin mining system, as well as a decentralised Bitcoin exchange.

Advertisement

Twitter allows users to tip their favourite content creators with Bitcoin and has been testing integrations with non-fungible tokens (NFTs), a type of digital asset that allows people to collect unique digital art.

Analysts see the transition as a positive signal for Square, the fintech platform he co-founded in 2009. Square’s core Cash App, after a bull run in its share in 2020, has experienced slower growth in the most recent quarter. It is also trying to digest the $29 billion (roughly Rs. 2,17,240 crore) acquisition of Buy Now Pay Later provider Afterpay, its largest acquisition ever.

But these ambitions will not pay off until years from now, analysts cautioned.

“The blockchain platform they’re trying to develop is great but also fraught with technical challenges and difficult to scale for consumers. I think he’ll focus more on Square and crypto will be part of that,” said Christopher Brendler, an analyst at DA Davidson.

See also  What Is Social Media Management? (Plus 9 Tools for 2022)

© Thomson Reuters 2021

Advertisement

Interested in cryptocurrency? We discuss all things crypto with WazirX CEO Nischal Shetty and WeekendInvesting founder Alok Jain on Orbital, the Gadgets 360 podcast. Orbital is available on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music and wherever you get your podcasts.

Cryptocurrency is an unregulated digital currency, not a legal tender and subject to market risks. The information provided in the article is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice, trading advice or any other advice or recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by NDTV. NDTV shall not be responsible for any loss arising from any investment based on any perceived recommendation, forecast or any other information contained in the article.

(This story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Continue Reading

TWITTER

Twitter Bans Sharing Personal Photos, Videos of Other People Without Consent

Published

on

By

twitter-bans-sharing-personal-photos,-videos-of-other-people-without-consent
en flag
sv flag

Twitter launched new rules Tuesday blocking users from sharing private images of other people without their consent, in a tightening of the network’s policy just a day after it changed CEOs.

Under the new rules, people who are not public figures can ask Twitter to take down pictures or video of them that they report were posted without permission.

Beginning today, we will not allow the sharing of private media, such as images or videos of private individuals without their consent. Publishing people’s private info is also prohibited under the policy, as is threatening or incentivizing others to do so.https://t.co/7EXvXdwegG

— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) November 30, 2021

Twitter said this policy does not apply to “public figures or individuals when media and accompanying tweet text are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse.”

“We will always try to assess the context in which the content is shared and, in such cases, we may allow the images or videos to remain on the service,” the company added.

Advertisement

The right of Internet users to appeal to platforms when images or data about them are posted by third parties, especially for malicious purposes, has been debated for years.

Twitter already prohibited the publication of private information such as a person’s phone number or address, but there are “growing concerns” about the use of content to “harass, intimidate, and reveal the identities of individuals,” Twitter said.

The company noted a “disproportionate effect on women, activists, dissidents, and members of minority communities.”

High-profile examples of online harassment include the barrages of racist, sexist,and homophobic abuse on Twitch, the world’s biggest video game streaming site.

But instances of harassment abound, and victims must often wage lengthy fights to see hurtful, insulting or illegally produced images of themselves removed from the online platforms.

Advertisement

Some Twitter users pushed the company to clarify exactly how the tightened policy would work.

“Does this mean that if I take a picture of, say, a concert in Central Park, I need the permission of everyone in it? We diminish the sense of the public to the detriment of the public,” tweeted Jeff Jarvis, a journalism professor at the City University of New York.

The change came the day after Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey announced he was leaving the company, and handed CEO duties to company executive Parag Agrawal.

The platform, like other social media networks, has struggled against bullying, misinformation, and hate-fuelled content.


Advertisement
See also  What Is Social Media Management? (Plus 9 Tools for 2022)
Continue Reading

Trending